Ant. But whether were the ten commandments, as they were delivered to them on Mount Sinai, the covenant of works or no?
Evan. They were delivered to them as the covenant of works. 1
Nom. But, by your favour, sir, you know that these people were the posterity of Abraham, and therefore under that covenant of grace which God made with their father; and therefore I do not think that they were delivered to them as the covenant of works; for you know the Lord never delivers the covenant of works to any that are under the covenant of grace.
Evan. Indeed it is true, the Lord did manifest so much love to the body of this nation, that all the natural seed of Abraham were externally, and by profession, under the covenant of grace made with their father Abraham; though, it is to be feared, many of them were still under the covenant of works made with their father Adam. 2
Nom. But, sir, you know, in the preface to the ten commandments, the Lord calls himself by the name of their God in general; and therefore it should seem that they were all of them the people of God. 3
Evan. That is nothing to the purpose; 4 for many wicked and ungodly men, being in the visible church, and under the external covenant, are called the chosen of God, and the people of God, though they be not so. In like manner were many of these Israelites called the people of God, though indeed they were not so.
Nom. But, sir, was the same covenant of works made with them that was made with Adam?
Evan. For the general substance of the duty, the law delivered on Mount Sinai, and formerly engraven on man's heart, was one and the same; so that at Mount Sinai the Lord delivered no new thing, only it came more gently to Adam before his fall, but after his fall came thunder with it.
Nom. Ay, sir, but as yourself said, the ten commandments, as they were written in Adam's heart, were but the matter of the covenant of works, and not the covenant itself, till the form was annexed to them, that is to say, till God and man were thereupon agreed: now, we do not find that God and these people did agree upon any such terms at Mount Sinai.
Evan. No; 5 say you so? do you not remember that the Lord consented and agreed, when he said, (Lev 18:5), "Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, which if a man do, he shall live in them"; and in Deuteronomy 27:26, when he said, "Cursed is he that confirmeth not all the words of this law, to do them?" And do you not remember that the people consented, (Exo 19:8), and agreed, when they said, "All that the Lord hath spoken we will do?" And doth not the apostle Paul give evidence that these words were the form of the covenant of works, when he says, (Rom 10:5), "Moses describeth that righteousness which is of the law, that the man that doeth these things shall live in them"; and when he says, (Gal 3:10), "For it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things written in the book of the law to do them?" 6 And in Deuteronomy 4:13, Moses, in express terms, calls it a covenant, saying, "And he declared unto you his covenant, which he commanded you to perform, even the ten commandments, and he wrote them upon tables of stone." Now, this was not the covenant of grace; for Moses afterwards, (Deut 5:3), speaking of this covenant, says, "God made not this covenant with your fathers, but with you"; and by "fathers" all the patriarchs unto Adam may be meant, [says Mr. Ainsworth,] who had the promise of the covenant of Christ. 7 Therefore, if it had been the covenant of grace, he would have said, God did make this covenant with them, rather than that he did not. 8
Nom. And do any of our godly and modern writers agree with you on this point?
Evan. Yes, indeed. Polonus says, "The covenant of works is that in which God promiseth everlasting life unto a man that in all respects performeth perfect obedience to the law of works, adding thereunto threatenings of eternal death, if he shall not perform perfect obedience thereto. God made this covenant in the beginning with the first man Adam, whilst he was in the first estate of integrity: the same covenant God did repeat and make again by Moses with the people of Israel." And Dr. Preston, on the New Covenant, [p. 317,] says, "The covenant of works runs in these terms, 'Do this and thou shalt live, and I will be thy God.' This was the covenant which was made with Adam, and the covenant that is expressed by Moses in the moral law." And Mr. Pemble [Vind. Fid. p. 152] says, "By the covenant of works, we understand what we call in one word 'the law,' namely, that means of bringing man to salvation, which is by perfect obedience unto the will of God. Hereof there are also two several administrations; the first is with Adam before his fall, when immortality and happiness were promised to man, and confirmed by an external symbol of the tree of life, upon condition that he continued obedient to God, as well in all other things, as in that particular commandment of not eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The second administration of this covenant was the renewing thereof with the Israelites at Mount Sinai; where, after the light of nature began to grow darker, and corruption had in time worn out the characters of religion and virtue first grave in man's heart, 9 God revived the law by a compendious and full declaration of all duties required of man towards God or his neighbour, expressed in the decalogue; according to the tenor of which law God entered into covenant with the Israelites, promising to be their God in bestowing upon them all blessings of life and happiness, upon condition that they would be his people, obeying all things that he had commanded; which condition they accepted of, promising an absolute obedience, (Exo 19:8), 'all things which the Lord hath said we will do'; and also submitting themselves to all punishment in case they disobeyed, saying, 'Amen' to the curse of the law, 'Cursed be every one that confirmeth not all the words of the law: and all the people shall say, Amen.'" And Mr. Walker, on the Covenant, [p. 128,] says, that "the first part of the covenant, which God made with Israel at Horeb, was nothing else but a renewing of the old covenant of works, 10 which God made with Adam in paradise." And it is generally laid down by our divines, that we are by Christ delivered from the law as it is a covenant. 11
Nom. But, sir, were the children of Israel at this time better able to perform the condition of the covenant of works, than either Adam or any of the old patriarchs were, that God renewed it now with them, rather than before?
Evan. No, indeed; God did not renew it with them now, and not before, because they were better able to keep it, but because they had more need to be made acquainted what the covenant of works is, than those before. For though it is true the ten commandments, which were at first perfectly written in Adam's heart, were much obliterated 12 by his fall, yet some impressions and relics thereof still remained; 13 and Adam himself was very sensible of his fall, and the rest of the fathers were helped by tradition; 14 and, says Cameron, "God did speak to the patriarchs from heaven, yea, and he spake unto them by his angels"; 15 but now, by this time, sin had almost obliterated and defaced the impressions of the law written in their hearts; 16 and by their being so long in Egypt, they were so corrupted, that the instructions and ordinances of their fathers were almost worn out of mind; and their fall in Adam was almost forgotten, as the apostle testifies, (Rom 5:13,14), saying, "Before the time of the law, sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law." Nay, in that long course of time betwixt Adam and Moses, men had forgotten what was sin; so, although God had made a promise of blessing to Abraham, and to all his seed, that would plead interest in it, 17 yet these people at this time were proud and secure, and heedless of their estate; and though "sin was in them, and death reigned over them," yet they being without a law to evidence this sin and death unto their consciences, 18 they did not impute it unto themselves, they would not own it, nor charge themselves with it; and so, by consequence, found no need of pleading the promise made to Abraham; 19 (Rom 5:20), therefore, "the law entered," that Adam's offence and their own actual transgression might abound, so that now the Lord saw it needful, that there should be a new edition and publication of the covenant of works, the sooner to compel the elect unbelievers to come to Christ, the promised seed, and that the grace of God in Christ to the elect believers might appear the more exceeding glorious. So that you see the Lord's intention therein was, that they, by looking upon this covenant might be put in mind what was their duty of old, when they were in Adam's loins; yea, and what was their duty still, if they would stand to that covenant, and so go the old and natural way to work; yea, and hereby they were also to see what was their present infirmity in not doing their duty: 20 that so they seeing an impossibility of obtaining life by that way of works, first appointed in paradise, they might be humbled, and more heedfully mind the promise made to their father Abraham, and hasten to lay hold on the Messiah, or promised seed.
Nom. Then, sir, it seems that the Lord did not renew the covenant of works with them, to the intent that they should obtain eternal life by their yielding obedience to it?
Evan. No, indeed; God never made the covenant of works with any man since the fall, either with expectation that he should fulfil it, 21 or to give him life by it; for God never appoints any thing to an end, to the which it is utterly unsuitable and improper. Now the law, as it is the covenant of works, is become weak and unprofitable to the purpose of salvation; 22 and, therefore, God never appointed it to man, since the fall, to that end. And besides, it is manifest that the purpose of God, in the covenant made with Abraham, was to give life and salvation by grace and promise; and, therefore, his purpose in renewing the covenant of works, was not, neither could be, to give life and salvation by working; for then there would have been contradictions in the covenants, and instability in him that made them. Wherefore let no man imagine that God published the covenant of works on Mount Sinai, as though he had been mutable, and so changed his determination in that covenant made with Abraham; neither, yet let any man suppose, that God now in process of time had found out a better way for man's salvation than he knew before: for, as the covenant of grace made with Abraham had been needless, if the covenant of works made with Adam would have given him and his believing seed life; so, after the covenant of grace was once made, it was needless to renew the covenant of works, to the end that righteousness of life should be had by the observation of it. The which will yet more evidently appear, if we consider, that the apostle, speaking of the covenant of works as it was given on Mount Sinai, says, "It was added because of transgressions," (Gal 3:19). It was not set up as a solid rule of righteousness, as it was given to Adam in paradise, but was added or put to; 23 it was not set up as a thing in gross by itself.
Nom. Then, sir, it should seem that the covenant of works was added to the covenant of grace, to make it more complete.
Evan. O no! you are not so to understand the apostle, as though it were added by way of ingrediency as a part of the covenant of grace, as if that covenant had been incomplete without the covenant of works; for then the same covenant should have consisted of contradictory materials, and so it should have overthrown itself; for, says the apostle, "If it be by grace, then it is no more of works; otherwise grace is no more grace: but if it be of works, then it is no more of grace; otherwise work is no more work," (Rom 11:6). But it was added by way of subserviency and attendance, the better to advance and make effectual the covenant of grace; so that although the same covenant that was made with Adam was renewed on Mount Sinai, yet I say still, it was not for the same purpose. For this was it that God aimed at, in making the covenant of works with man in innocency, to have that which was his due from man: 24 but God made it with the Israelites for no other end, than that man, being thereby convinced of his weakness, might flee to Christ. So that it was renewed only to help forward and introduce another and a better covenant; and so to be a manuduction unto Christ, viz: to discover sin, to waken the conscience, and to convince them of their own impotency, and so drive them out of themselves to Christ. Know it then, I beseech you, that all this while there was no other way of life given, either in whole, or in part, than the covenant of grace. All this while God did but pursue the design of his own grace; and, therefore, was there no inconsistency either in God's will or acts; only such was his mercy, that he subordinated the covenant of works, and made it subservient to the covenant of grace, and so to tend to evangelical purposes.
Nom. But yet, sir, methinks it is somewhat strange that the Lord should put them upon doing the law, and also promise them life for doing, and yet never intend it.
Evan. Though he did so, yet did he neither require of them that which was unjust, nor yet dissemble with them in the promise; for the Lord may justly require perfect obedience at all men's hands, by virtue of that covenant which was made with them in Adam; and if any man could yield perfect obedience to the law, both in doing and suffering, he should have eternal life; for we may not deny [says Calvin] but that the reward of eternal salvation belongeth to the upright obedience of the law. 25 But God knew well enough that the Israelites were never able to yield such an obedience: and yet he saw it meet to propound eternal life to them upon these terms; that so he might speak to them in their own humour, as indeed it was meet: for they swelled with mad assurance in themselves, saying, "All that the Lord commandeth we will do," and be obedient, (Exo 19:8). Well, said the Lord, if you will needs be doing, why here is a law to be kept; and if you can fully observe the righteousness of it, you shall be saved: sending them of purpose to the law, to awaken and convince them, to sentence and humble them, and to make them see their own folly in seeking for life that way; in short, to make them see the terms under which they stood, that so they might be brought out of themselves, and expect nothing from the law, in relation to life, but all from Christ. For how should a man see his need of life by Christ, if he do not first see that he is fallen from the way of life? and how should he understand how far he had strayed from the way of life, unless he do first find what is that way of life? Therefore it was needful that the Lord should deal with them after such a manner to drive them out of themselves, and from all confidence in the works of the law; that so, by faith in Christ, they might obtain righteousness and life. And just so did our Saviour also deal with that young expounder of the law, (Matt 19:16), who it seems, was sick of the same disease: "Good Master," says he, "what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?" He doth not, says Calvin, simply ask, which way or by what means he should come to eternal life, but what good he should do to get it; whereby it appears, that he was a proud justiciary, one that swelled in fleshly opinion that he could keep the law, and be saved by it; therefore he is worthily sent to the law to work himself weary, and to see need to come to Christ for rest. And thus you see that the Lord, to the former promises made to the fathers, added a fiery law; which he gave from Mount Sinai, in thundering and lightning, and with a terrible voice, to the stubborn and stiff-necked Israel; whereby to break and tame them, and to make them sigh and long for the promised Redeemer.
[Previous: The promise renewed to Abraham.]
[Next: The promise and covenant with Abraham, renewed with the Israelites]
[Back]
[1] As to this point, there are different sentiments among
orthodox divines; though all of them do agree, that the way of
salvation was the same under the Old and New Testament, and that the
Sinai covenant, whatever it was, carried no prejudice to the promise
made unto Abraham, and the way of salvation therein revealed, but
served to lead men to Jesus Christ. Our author is far from being
singular in this decision of this question. I adduce only the
testimonies of three late learned writers, "That God made such a
covenant [viz: the covenant of works] with our first parents, is
confirmed by several parts of Scripture," (Hosea 6:7, Gal
4:24),—Willison's Sacr. Cat. p. 3. The words of the text last quoted
are these: "For these are the two covenants, the one from the Mount
Sinai which gendereth to bondage." Hence it appears, that in the
judgment of this author, the covenant from Mount Sinai was the
covenant of works, otherwise there is no shadow of reason from this
text for what it is adduced to prove. The Rev. Messrs. Flint and
M'Claren, in their elaborate and seasonable treatise against Professor
Simpson's doctrine, [for which I make no question but their names will
be in honour with posterity] speak to the same purpose. The former
having adduced the fore-cited text, (Gal 4:24), says, Jam duo federa,
&c., that is, "Now here are two covenants mentioned, the first the
legal one, by sin rendered ineffectual, entered into with Adam, and
now again promulgate." [Exam. Doctr. Joh. Simp. p. 125.] And
afterwards, speaking of the law of works, he adds, Atque hoc est illud
fadus, &c., that is, "And this is that covenant promulgate on Mount
Sinai, which is called one of the covenants," (Gal 4:24). Ibid. p.
131. The words of the latter, speaking of the covenant of works are
these, "Yea, it is expressly called a covenant," (Hosea 6, Gal 4). And
Mr. Gillespie proves strongly, that Galations 4 is understood of the
covenant of works and grace. See his Ark of the Testament, part 1.
chap. 5. p. 180. The New Scheme Examined, p. 176. The delivering of
the ten commandments on Mount Sinai as the covenant of works,
necessarily includes in it the delivering of them as a perfect rule of
righteousness; forasmuch as that covenant did always contain in it
such a rule, the true knowledge of which the Israelites were at that
time in great want of, as our author afterwards teaches.
[Back]
[2] The strength of the objection in the preceding paragraph
lies here, namely, that at this rate, the same person, at one and the
same time, were both under the covenant of works, and under the
covenant of grace, which is absurd. Ans. The unbelieving Israelites
were under the covenant of grace made with their father Abraham
externally and by profession, in respect of their visible church
state; but under the covenant of works made with their father Adam
internally and really, in respect of the state of their souls before
the Lord. Herein there is no absurdity; for to this day many in the
visible church are thus, in these different respects, under both
covenants. Farther, as to believers among them, they were internally
and really, as well as externally, under the covenant of grace; and
only externally under the covenant of works, and that, not as a
covenant co-ordinate with, but subordinate and subservient unto, the
covenant of grace: and in this there is no more inconsistency than in
the former.
[Back]
[3] As delivered from the covenant of works, by virtue of the
covenant of grace.
[Back]
[4] That will not, indeed, prove them all to have been the
people of God in the sense before given, for the reason here adduced
by our author.
Howbeit, the preface to the ten commandments deserves a particular
notice in the matter of the Sinai transaction, (Exo 20:2), "I am the
Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of
the house of bondage." Hence it is evident to me, that the covenant of
grace was delivered to the Israelites on Mount Sinai. For the Son of
God, the messenger of the covenant of grace, spoke these words to a
select people, the natural seed of Abraham, typical of his whole
spiritual seed. He avoucheth himself to be their God; namely, in
virtue of the promise, or covenant made with Abraham, (Gen 17:7), "I
will establish my covenant—to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed
after thee": and their God, which brought them out of the land of
Egypt; according to the promise made to Abraham at the most solemn
renewal of the covenant with him.—(Gen 15:14), "Afterwards shall they
come out with great substance. And he first declares himself their
God, and then requires obedience, according to the manner of the
covenant with Abraham, (Gen 17:1); "I am the Almighty God, [i.e. in
the language of the covenant, The Almighty God TO THEE, to make THEE
for ever blest through the promised SEED,] walk thou before me, and be
thou perfect."
But that the covenant of works was also, for special ends, repeated
and delivered to the Israelites on Mount Sinai, I cannot refuse, 1.
Because of the apostle's testimony, (Gal 4:24), "These are the two
covenants; the one from Mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage." For
the children of this Sinai covenant the apostle here treats of, are
excluded from the eternal inheritance, as Ishmael was from Canaan, the
type of it, (verse 30), "Cast out the bond-woman and her son; for the
son of the bond-woman shall not be heir with the son of the free
woman"; but this could never be said of the children of the covenant
of grace under any dispensation, though both the law and covenant from
Sinai itself, and its children, were even before the coming of Christ
under a sentence of exclusion, to be executed on them respectively in
due time. 2. The nature of the covenant of works is most expressly in
the New Testament brought in, propounded, and explained from the
Mosaical dispensation. The commands of it from Exodus 20 by our
blessed Saviour, (Matt 19:17-19), "If thou wilt enter into life keep
the commandments. He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do
no murder, thou shalt not commit adultery," &c. The promise of it,
(Rom 10:5), "Moses describes the righteousness which is of the law,
that the man which doth these things shall live by them." The commands
and promise of it together, see Luke 10:25-28. The terrible sanction
of it, Galations 3:10. For it is written [viz: Deuteronomy 27:26,]
"Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are
written in the book of the law to do them." 3. To this may be added
the opposition betwixt the law and grace, so frequently inculcated in
the New Testament, especially in Paul's epistles. See one text for
all, (Gal 3:12), "And the law is not of faith, but the man that doeth
them shall live in them." 4. The law from Mount Sinai was a covenant,
(Gal 4:24), "These are the two covenants, the one from the Mount
Sinai"; and such a covenant as had a semblance of disannulling the
covenant of grace, (Gal 3:17), "The covenant that was confirmed before
of God in Christ, the law which was 430 years after, cannot disannul";
yea, such an one as did, in its own nature, bear a method of obtaining
the inheritance, so far different from that of the promise, that it
was inconsistent with it; "For if the inheritance be of the law, it is
no more of promise," (Gal 3:18), wherefore the covenant of the law
from Mount Sinai could not be the covenant of grace, unless one will
make this last not only a covenant seeming to destroy itself, but
really inconsistent: but it was the covenant of works, which indeed
had such a semblance, and in its own nature did bear such a method as
before noted; howbeit, as Ainsworth says, "The covenant of the law now
given could not disannul the covenant of grace," (Gal 3:17). Annot. on
Exodus 19:1
Wherefore I conceive the two covenants to have been both delivered on
Mount Sinai to the Israelites. First, The covenant of grace made with
Abraham, contained in the preface, repeated and promulgate there unto
Israel, to be believed and embraced by faith, that they might be
saved; to which were annexed the ten commandments, given by the
Mediator Christ, the head of the covenant, as a rule of life to his
covenant people. Secondly, the covenant of works made with Adam,
contained in the same ten commands, delivered with thunderings and
lightnings, the meaning of which was afterwards cleared by Moses,
describing the righteousness of the law and sanction thereof, repeated
and promulgate to the Israelites there, as the original perfect rule
of righteousness, to be obeyed; and yet were they no more bound hereby
to seek righteousness by the law than the young man was by our
Saviour's saying to him, (Matt 19:17,18), "If thou wilt enter into
life, keep the commandments—Thou shalt do no murder," &c. The latter
was a repetition of the former.
Thus there is no confounding of the two covenants of grace and works;
but the latter was added to the former as subservient unto it, to turn
their eyes towards the promise, or covenant of grace: "God gave it to
Abraham by promise. Wherefore then serveth the law? it was added,
because of transgressions, till the Seed should come," (Gal 3:18,19).
So it was unto the promise given to Abraham, that this subservient
covenant was added; and that promise we have found in the preface to
the ten commands. To it, then was the subservient covenant, according
to the apostle, added, put, or set to, as the word properly signifies.
So it was no part of the covenant of grace, the which was entire to
the fathers, before the time that was set to it; and yet is, to the
New Testament church, after that is taken away from it: for, says the
apostle, "It was added till the seed should come." Hence it appears
that the covenant of grace was, both in itself, and in God's
intention, the principal part of the Sinai transaction: nevertheless,
the covenant of works was the most conspicuous part of it, and lay
most open to the view of the people.
According to this account of the Sinai transaction, the ten commands,
there delivered, must come under a twofold notion or consideration;
namely, as the law of Christ, and as the law of works: and this is not
strange, if it is considered, that they were twice written on tables
of stone, by the Lord himself,—the first tables the work of God, (Exo
32:16), which were broken in pieces, (verse 19), called the tables of
the covenant, (Deut 9:11,15)—the second tables, the work of Moses,
the typical Mediator, (Exo 34:1), deposited at first [it would seem]
in the tabernacle mentioned, (33:7), afterward, at the rearing of the
tabernacle with all its furniture, laid up in the ark within the
tabernacle, (25:16); and whether or not, some such thing is intimated,
by the double accentuation of the decalogue, let the learned
determine; but to the ocular inspection it is evident, that the
preface to the ten commands, (Exo 20:2, Deut 5:6), stands in the
original, both as a part of a sentence joined to the first commands,
and also as an entire sentence, separated from it, and shut up by
itself.
Upon the whole, one may compare with this the first promulgation of
the covenant of grace, by the messenger of the covenant in paradise,
(Gen 3:15), and the flaming sword placed there by the same hand,
"turning every way to keep the way of the tree of life."
[Back]
[5] Here, there is a large addition in the ninth edition of this
book, London, 1699. It well deserves a place, and is as follows: "I do
not say, God made the covenant of works with them, that they might
obtain life and salvation thereby; no, the law was become weak through
the flesh, as to any such purpose, (Rom 8:3). But he repeated, or gave
a new edition of the law, and that, as a covenant of works, for their
humbling and conviction; and so do his ministers preach the law to
unconverted sinners still, that they who 'desire to be under the law
may hear what the law says,' (Gal 4:21). And as to what you say of
their not agreeing to this covenant, I pray take notice, that the
covenant of works was made with Adam, not for himself only, but as he
was a public person representing all his posterity, and so that
covenant was made with the whole nature of man in him, as appears by
Adam's sin and curse coming upon all, (Rom 5:12, Gal 3:10). Hence all
men are born under that covenant, whether they agree to it or no;
though, indeed, there is by nature such a proneness in all to desire
to be under that covenant, and to work for life, that if natural men's
consent were asked, they would readily [though ignorantly] take upon
them to do all that the Lord requireth; for do you not remember," &c.
[Back]
[6] That the conditional promise, (Lev 18:5), [to which agrees
Exodus 19:8,] and the dreadful threatening, (Deut 27:26), were both
given to the Israelites, as well as the ten commands, is beyond
question; and that according to the apostle, (Rom 10:5, Gal 3:10),
they were the form of the covenant of works, is as evident as the
repeating of the words, and expounding them so, can make it. How,
then, one can refuse the covenant of works to have been given to the
Israelites, I cannot see. Mark the Westminster Confession upon the
head of the covenant of works; "The first covenant made with man was a
covenant of works, wherein life was promised to Adam, and in him to
his posterity, upon condition of perfect and personal obedience." And
this account of the being and nature of that covenant is there proved
from these very texts among others, Romans 10:5, Galatians 3:10, chap.
7, art. 2.
[Back]
[7] "But the covenant of the law [adds he] came after, as the
apostle observeth, (Gen 3:17).—They had a greater benefit than their
fathers; for though the law could not give them life, yet it was a
schoolmaster unto, i.e., to bring them unto, Christ." (Gal 3:21-24).
Ainsworth on Deuteronomy 5:3.
[Back]
[8] The transaction at Sinai or Horeb [for they are but one
mountain] was a mixed dispensation; there was the promise or covenant
of grace, and also the law; the one a covenant to be believed, the
other a covenant to be done, and thus the apostle states, the
difference betwixt these two, (Gal 3:12), "And the law is not of
faith, but the man that DOETH them shall live in them." As to the
former, viz: the covenant to be believed, it was given to their
fathers as well as to them. Of the latter, viz: the covenant to be
done, Moses speaks expressly, (Deut 4:12,13), "The Lord spake unto you
out of the midst of the fire, and he declared unto you his covenant,
which he commanded you to PERFORM [or DO] even ten commandments." And
(5:3), he tells the people no less expressly, that "the Lord made not
THIS COVENANT with their fathers."
[Back]
[9] That is, had worn them out, in the same measure and degree
as the light of nature was darkened; but neither the one nor the other
was ever fully done. (Rom 2:14,15).
[Back]
[10] Wherein I differ from this learned author as to this point,
and for what reasons, may be seen earlier [footnote #4].
[Back]
[11] But not as it is a rule of life, which is the other member
of that distinction.
[Back]
[12] Both in the heart of Adam himself, and of his descendants in
the first ages of the world.
[Back]
[13] Both with him and them.
[Back]
[14] The doctrine of the fall, with whatsoever other doctrine was
necessary to salvation, was handed down from Adam, the fathers
communicating the same to their children and children's children.
There were but eleven patriarchs before the flood; 1. Adam, 2. Seth,
3. Enos, 4. Cainan, 5. Mahalaleel, 6. Jared, 7. Enoch, 8, Methuselah,
9. Lamech, 10. Noah, 11. Shem. Adam having lived 930 years, (Gen 5:5),
was known to Lamech, Noah's father, with whom he lived 66 years, and
much longer with the rest of the fathers before him; so that Lamech,
and those before him, might have the doctrine from Adam's own mouth.
Methuselah lived with Adam 243 years, and with Shem 98 years before
the deluge. See Genesis 5. And what Shem, who, after the deluge, lived
502 years, (Gen 11:10,11), had learned from Methuselah, he had
occasion to teach Arphaxad, Salah, Eber, Peleg, Reu, Serug, Nahor,
Terah, Abraham, Isaac, (Gen 21:5,), and Jacob, to whose 51st year he
[viz: Shem] reached. Genesis 11:10, and 21:5, and 25:26, compared.
[Vid. Bail. Op. Hist. Chron. p. 2, 3.] Thus one may perceive, how the
nature of the law and covenant of works given to Adam, might be far
better known to them, than to the Israelites after their long bondage
in Egypt.
[Back]
[15] That is, and besides all this, God spake to the patriarchs
immediately and by angels. But neither of these do we find during the
time of the bondage in Egypt, until the angel of the Lord appeared to
Moses in the bush, and ordered him to go and bring the people out of
Egypt, (Exo 3).
[Back]
[16] The remaining impressions of the law on the hearts of the
Israelites.
[Back]
[17] By faith; believing, embracing, and appropriating it to
themselves, (Heb 11:13, Jer 3:4).
[Back]
[18] Inasmuch as the remaining impressions of the law on their
hearts were so weak, that they were not sufficient for the purpose.
[Back]
[19] By faith proposing it as their only defence, and opposing it
to the demands of the law or covenant of works, as their only plea.
[Back]
[20] How far they came short of, and could not reach unto the
obedience they owed unto God, according to the perfection of the holy
law.
[Back]
[21] Nor before the fall neither, properly speaking; but the
expression is agreeable to Scripture style, (Isa 5:4), "Wherefore when
I looked it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wild grapes?"
[Back]
[22] (Rom 8:3), "For what the law could not DO, in that it was
weak through the flesh; God sending his own Son," &c.
[Back]
[23] It was not set up by itself as an entire rule of
righteousness, to which alone they were to look who desired
righteousness and salvation, as it was in the case of upright Adam,
"For no man, since the fall, can attain to righteousness and life by
the moral law," Lar. Cat. quest. 94. But it was added to the covenant
of grace, that by looking at it men might see what kind of
righteousness it is by which they can be justified in the sight of
God; and that by means thereof, finding themselves destitute of that
righteousness, they might be moved to embrace the covenant of grace,
in which that righteousness is held forth to be received by faith.
[Back]
[24] This was the end of the work, namely, of making the covenant
of works with Adam, but not of the repeating of it at Sinai; it was
also the end or design of the worker, namely of God, who made that
covenant with Adam, to have his due from man, and he got it from the
Man Christ Jesus.
[Back]
[25] That is, the perfect obedience of the law; as it is said,
(Eccl 7:29), "God made man upright."